Subject	You may be right I was concerned because of the >>>
Posted by	NONE on August 25, 2001 at 9:44 PM
	This message has been viewed 28 times.
In Reply To	I dont think we are losing combustion due to water at all. posted by niXit on August 25, 2001 at 09:33 PM
Message	write ups in SCC and others. But you have the testing I would appreciate it if you would send me an email and let me know maybe I am overthinking it for no reason.
Follow Ups	Aquamist tuning: Day two. - niXit 20:55:15 08/25/01 Who cares about all that Jibba Jabba - Jack B. 20:57:48 08/25/01 They were goober grape colered - Dallas DamonZ 21:00:31 08/25/01 Sweet (n/m) - F8IZHIS 21:00:39 08/25/01 BAH! I'll still beat him at Hallett HAHAHAHAHAHAHA (n/m) - Elguapo (Dallas) 21:02:37 08/25/01 Are you running a two step ECU for the aquamist? (n/m) - NONE 21:02:58 08/25/01 No, actually we are using a phantom ECU. - niXit 21:05:51 08/25/01 But dont you want to run advanced timing with the mist>>> - NONE 21:10:17 08/25/01 you want your boost setting to control the car. - niXit 21:15:40 08/25/01 I know some people use a timing advance module to overcome>> - NONE 21:23:07 08/25/01 that's exactly what I'm thinking too... race gas program - Bernie 21:27:56 08/25/01 here's all i know regarding timing. - niXit 21:29:44 08/25/01 But thats the thing about the water it prevents detonation>> - NONE 21:41:20 08/25/01 I would think that youd want more boost then more timing. - niXit 21:43:34 08/25/01 my 0.2 bar worth (this is good) >>>>> - Kiwi_Z 22:27:57 08/25/01 I dont think we are losing combustion due to water at all. - niXit 21:33:28 08/25/01 You may be right I was concerned because of the >>> - NONE 21:44:42 08/25/01 mike kojima reported the same thing... slightly lower combus - Bernie 18:33:12 08/26/01 Re:cleans the hell out of the intake (and valves?)... - Buzz 07:19:39 08/26/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.